The presidential candidate of the Labour Party, LP, Mr. Peter Obi, has accused the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) of being biased in the 2023 election.
Obi made the claim in response to a preliminary objection the commission filed in support of the President-elect and candidate of the ruling All Progressives Congress, APC, Mr. Bola Tinubu.
The Labour Party presidential candidate noted that both the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal had in the past, cautioned INEC not to place itself “in a position where “imputation of partiality in favour of one party against one will be leveled against it”.
Asides from describing INEC’s preliminary objection as “misconceived”, he also recalled that the apex court had in the case of Attorney General of the Federation V. Abubakar (2007) 10 NWLR (Pto 1041), emphasized that the electoral Commission must not only embrace neutrality as it’s watchword, but “must always remain fair and focused”.
Obi said;
“The 1st Respondent, forgetting its role as an electoral umpire, gave a Notice of Preliminary Objection to challenge the alleged incompetence of the Petition.
“The global best practice for electoral umpires in national elections is that an electoral body must avoid creating the impression that it has no respect for neutrality in an electoral contest between candidates.
“The appellate courts have repeatedly admonished the 1st Respondent of its need to remain neutral in election proceedings. However, the 1st Respondent hereof, has remained impervious to change.
“Therefore, it is not only an embarrassment but a repudiation of the duty of the 1st Respondent when it adorns the garb of a contestant in an election it conducted as an umpire to raise preliminary objection against an Election Petition as in the case hereof.
“The expectation is that INEC will maintain a neutral stance in all litigations where participants in elections are challenging the outcome of the elections and not indulge in filling objections to the Petition.”
